Latest Posts
-
The Clean Energy Link: Who Really Pulls the Levers?
Western Australia’s Clean Energy Link is sold as a bold step toward decarbonisation. But scratch the surface, and it starts to look more like a well-rehearsed script — one where the costs are socialised, the risks are absorbed by the public, and the profits are captured quietly by a web of actors who never seem
-
Hayek’s Road to Serfdom: A Blueprint of Bureaucratic Bondage
Friedrich Hayek’s The Road to Serfdom warns how central planning and collectivism open the door to totalitarianism—an insight more urgent than ever in today’s algorithmic age.
-
Is Land Ownership in Western Australia Truly Ownership? A Look at Title, Tenure, and Limits
Land title in Western Australia is not true ownership but a conditional tenure from the Crown, subject to laws, compulsory acquisition, and native title claims.
-
Reclaiming the Narrative (Part 10 of 10)
This final post reclaims the power of identity, challenging the historical suppression encoded in parish registers and urging personal agency through modern tools.
-
The Names That Weren’t Theirs (Part 8 of 10)
The surname Acton in Lichfield wasn’t inherited — it was assigned. Poor children were given names by clerks, not kin. Genealogy meets systemic labeling.
-
Citizen Erased (Part 9 of 10)
The Actons weren’t a family. They were a function. This is what happens when identity is assigned, not inherited — and you are documented only to be forgotten.
-
The Paper People of Lichfield (Part 1 of 10)
Were the Actons of Lichfield a real family—or administrative aliases for pauper children processed by the Church? We begin uncovering the paper people.
-
Throughput by Design (Part 2 of 10)
Bastardy bonds and illegitimacy shaped the Lichfield Actons. Were they a family — or simply a surname assigned to pauper children for recordkeeping ease?
-
The Actons of Lichfield: Bloodline or Brand? (Part 3 of 10)
Dozens of Actons appear in Lichfield parish records, but few can be reliably linked. Is this a family — or a brand assigned to pauper children by the system?
-
Surplus by Design (Part 4 of 10)
Lichfield’s pauper children weren’t accidental. They were surplus by design — managed through the Poor Law as labor, ledger entries, and institutional throughput.
